The issue of naming/re-naming is foregrounded in Walcott’s Another Life. This concept is particularly salient for the
In his poem, Names he says:
These palms are greater than
for no man made them,
Their fallen columns greater than Castille,
For no man unmade them
except the worm, who has no helmet,
but was always the emperor,
and children, look at these stars
over
Not Orion,
Not Betelgeuse,
Tell me, what do they look like?
Answer, you damned little Arabs!
Sir, fireflies caught in molasses (308).[3]
Describing the stars as "Fireflies caught in molasses" is both a delightful and different way of naming. But Walcott also insinuates that this description is both ingenious and revolutionary, that the power of words can and should match the power of armies, of Historians, of colonials, and of ill-fated revenge.
Walcott's emphasis on naming/re-naming counters the oft-made criticism that he is not an “authentic” representation of the
Why does Walcott emphasize naming? What is the power in a name?
No comments:
Post a Comment